Only Thing I'd Add Is About Medically Necessary Abortions, When The Life Of The Mother And/or Child Is

Only thing I'd add is about medically necessary abortions, when the life of the mother and/or child is in danger, it should absolutely be performed. But killing a child should never, ever be used as a means of contraception.

“I cannot pretend prochoice vs. prolife is about women versus babies. It isn't. It is about society versus families.

Abortion doesn't save women. It doesn't stop or fix rape. It doesn't end poverty. It doesn't stop domestic violence. It doesn't do anything except undo women's healthy biology, kill her child, and send her right back to whatever circumstances she came from.

Sure, if she just doesn't want to be pregnant, it ends pregnancy. Why doesn't she want to be pregnant though? The replies are along the lines of, "Fuck you. It doesn't matter. It is her choice and right." Ok. Thank you for telling me you care about abortion, not women.

This is what is being offered as the savior for women? This is our freedom? This is our equality? This is the answer we are being offered for children living in poverty, abuse, or neglect? Just pre-emptively guess their fate and kill them? This is what we are being offered as a way to address maternal mortality? Don't attempt to make advancements that address complications that arise in pregnancy, just blame women's biology and kill her kid?

I do not accept that this is the best we can do for women, children, or families. I do not accept that to be free, equal, and safe women have to turn against their biology and their children.”

– Robin Atkins

Baby fever doesn’t just apply to you women, it hits and it hits hard. Have you seen a man possessed by his most basic biological urge, driven with a passion in his eyes to see you pinned down, filled up, and carrying his kin in your stomach? Do you know what it feels like to be with a man that has nothing else on his mind but breeding you?

You can try to resist and dance around the subject, but you can put off your purpose in life for so long. You know that as well as anybody else, and in that moment that you feel there’s no protection, you might try to fight him off or try to get away, but he’s so much stronger than you. The way his hands grip your wrists or your waist like a vice commands an authority that tells your body to stay out and to take it. You don’t want him to finish inside you, or at least you think you don’t, but that’s not going to stop it from happening. It’s going to happen, over and over and over and over again, his girth stretching you apart and dumping load after load of his seed into you until finally he can look upon your body with pride, until he sees the most beautiful woman he’s ever laid eyes on because he made that baby bump

reblog if you either want to be absurdly pregnant or get someone absurdly pregnant

so pretty 💛🌷

I believe it stems from the primal instinct: ooga booga, woman carry baby, me hunt mammoth. It just manifests differently now, since, well, no more mammoths.

For a lot of men, providing for their woman is one of their love languages. On the one hand, you show yourself as capable, successful, etc. and on the other, you take some kind of worry off the shoulders of someone you love and (hopefully) see them relax and be happier and more carefree because of your efforts.

So, as long as you want to stay committed to him, don't feel bad for him paying for everything. If you really trust him, don't be afraid to be reliant on him. Independence can only go so far in a relationship and that goes for both sides. If you want to return the gesture, find something he can rely on you for.

Men, as an extremely independent woman, why do y'all wanna be a provider so bad when you're really in love with someone?? I went from paying for and doing everything for myself and now never lifting a finger or dropping a cent when he's around and it confuses the hell out of me. It scratches a very primal part of my brain but also it makes me feel bad :c

👋 🍑