Aziraphale Doesnt Need To Be Saved. He Never Has. He Gave Away His Flaming Sword And Lied To God's Face.

Aziraphale doesn’t need to be saved. He never has. He gave away his flaming sword and lied to God's face. He tricked Heaven once again to save three kids. He claims to be soft, but he is anything but. He stood with his flaming sword facing Satan. He stood with a dumb candelabra facing a horde of demons to save his bookshop and protect humans. He is absolutely capable of getting out of any situation. But oh, how Crowley loves to save him.

Ahhh we were robbed of their romance!!!

Love them 💞

Preach

With truly all the love and empathy in my heart: crying daily over the sexual assault allegations again at Gaiman isn’t healthy. I’ve seen multiple people –especially fans of GO – saying this since they came out, and it’s really fucking concerning me.

I wonder if it has to do with the insidious ideas that 1) people are either Bad or Good, 2) Bad people can only do Bad things, and 3) liking Bad things or Bad people makes you Bad.

None of these things are true.

People are mixed up and incredibly complicated. Someone can be an incredible artist/chef/ally against racism/drag queen and still be predatory/homophobic/antisemitic/never tips their wait staff. People do things that harm others in big and small ways all the time. You do too. I promise.

(Also the idea of dehumanizing anyone, even people who do genuinely insurmountable harm, as somehow less than human is an inherently fascist ideology)

The fact that you (yes, you!!) do harmful things doesn’t immediately make you Bad. There are certainly things that someone might do that causes more harm (say, assault) versus less, but, perhaps unfortunately, that doesn’t somehow infect all the things they’ve done in the past with their Badness. Gaiman helped write Good Omens. There’s no way now to say “I was wrong and this book was Bad all along” or even “oh, all the parts I like were written by Pratchett, the Bad parts must have been Gaiman.” You didn’t miss an inherent evil by liking the book in the past. It doesn’t make you Bad for liking it now.

(It also doesn’t mean that people associated with Gaiman, like David Tennant, are also Tainted by Badness. This is also a slippery slope argument into dehumanization and fascist ideas)

By all means: stop giving Gaiman your money. Stop tagging him in your Azi/Crowley fanart. But do this as a way to disentangle yourself from parasocial relationships that are actively causing you grief and to vote with your wallet, not because unlinking yourself from Bad Art and Bad People will somehow absolve you and make you Good again. If you already have a copy of Good Omens or Sandman, whether you reread it is between you and your gods. Interacting with a text you find important doesn’t make you Bad or Good. It’s just reading. What you do with the stories is what matters (ironically, that’s the message of a lot of both Gaiman and Pratchett’s work).

Maybe take a peek at Good Omens and re familiarize yourself with its other core message: People are not Bad or Good. People do bad and good things.

Then maybe drink a cup of tea. You need to rehydrate.

i got an anon ask telling me that i spoiled Dune for them. THE BOOKS HAVE BEEN OUT FOR OVER 50 YEARS AND THE FIRST MOVIE FOR LIKE 3??? 😭✋

heavily based on this cute fic which i cherish and love with all my heart and soul,,

go read it now !!!!!

https://archiveofourown.org/works/1871487

I also drew a meme based on this drawing