Hey So I Couldn't Help But Notice That While This Post Is Good A Lot Of The Replies R Shit

hey so i couldn't help but notice that while this post is good a lot of the replies r shit

there's a lot of ppl pointing out that "in txt magneto wanted 2 do a genocide against all non mutants" and while yes that is true there's more 2 it than that

the ppl who r saying magneto was right r not saying "genocide is super cool" what they r saying is "we shouldn't hav 2 play nice w/ the ppl who oppress us"

it's no mistake or coincidence imo that x-men is a series marketed 2wards ppl in minority groups and the representation of ppl who don't want 2 play nice w/ the oppressors is magneto, it's p obvious [at least from what little i've seen] that x-men is essentially just propaganda 2 try 2 demonise ppl who would rise up against their oppressors instead of asking them nicely if we can hav equal rights yet, not saying u can't enjoy x-men btw just wish that more ppl would watch media w/ their brains switched on instead of just ignoring all cultural context and then getting mad when ppl don't ignore said cultural context

it's like, disney villains were made queer coded 2 demonise queer ppl, and a lot of queer ppl reclaim those villains now bc of this, and no1 is saying that if a queer person reclaims a queer villain that that somehow now means that they agree w/ their actions in txt bc we r aware of the cultural context and keep that in mind

magneto was a character that was made 2 demonise ppl who's activism isn't oppressor friendly, i can't speak 4 what it was originally but at least what little i've seen it seems like it was written by the majority and marketed 2 minority groups 2 try 2 stop us from getting any ideas abt rising up against our oppressors

it's weird 2 me how ppl in the replies r saying that ppl who r saying magneto was right "don't hav any critical thinking skills" bc it just shows that they r just taking everything in x-men at face value w/out applying any thought abt cultural context and y the only guy who's anti oppressor is shown 2 b evil, like do u guys actually think that there's ever going 2 b a character in mainstream media who's in a minority group who's not willing 2 play nice w/ the oppressors who's ever going 2 b shown in a good or even honest light?? and i mean in a real way not in a "well it was just that we needed a different person in power" or "well it was just this individual that was bad not the system" kind of way

[sry if this is incoherent im typing this while sleep deprived]

love having an asthma attack so bad that i can't fkin stand or walk w/out feeling faint or being in pain a month l8r and then being told by my dr that i don't need a wheelchair since im not an old person and 2 "drink lots of fluids"/s

rly sick of y'all thinking it's ok 2 b ableist against ppl w/ npd and demonise them just bc u lot want a new mental illness 2 hate on, idc if u think ur "doing the world a favour" ur not, ur just being ableist, stop it, saying ppl w/ npd r inherently abusive monsters is not ok and it's the same as saying that every1 w/ DID is inherently a serial killer, it's just as demonising, just as inaccurate, just as ableist and no just bc u wanna play doctor and try 2 say that u think ur abuser might've had npd doesn't make it ok 2 act like every1 w/ npd is an abusive monster or that they were abusive bc of the npd, im friends w/ some1 w/ npd and they r the nicest person i ever met and seeing the way u lot talk abt them makes me fucking sick, ppl w/ npd r ppl and they c the way u talk abt them so mayb stop being dicks, idc if i lose followers over this, if ur honestly that ableist that u think having a diagnosis is the difference between some1 being a person and some1 being a monster then i don't want u anywhere near my blog this also goes 4 any1 who calls abusive behaviour "narcissistic behaviour" i get that u probably didn't realise that u were linking abusive behaviour 2 npd but u r and it's not ok so pls just stop doing it, if u continue then ur just adding 2 the problem

this is also a problem with the system pride flag being stolen and then used as the "super straight" flag

Yaknow how this week is aromantic awareness week and as the name states, is to spread awareness about aromanticism? I have been wearing the aro flag frequently wherever I go, and also have been keeping a small version of the flag on my bag to celebrate! However, I am extremely agitated over just how little is truly known about aromantic people.

The intention of having the flag around was to spread representation of arospec people and to educate others on our identity! And I am very pissed off to know more people recognize the aromantic flag not as what it truly is, but instead this:

Today someone had called my flag a “dreamsexual flag” and i have never felt more offended.

They took our flag. I don’t want to have to constantly worry that people see my flag and think I support a bigot. There is more recognition of this flag as a “dream flag” than what it actually stands for. This is why more people should be educated about aros. We are already doing what we can to fight amatonormativity and I have never been more furious to have my identity belittled to a “dreamsexual flag.” That is not what aromanticism stands for, and it never ever will stand for that.

So please educate yourself! When you see that flag please know what it genuinely means. It stands for a beautiful community of people who experience little to no romantic attraction. It does not stand for a community of uneducated people stealing flags and supporting bigots. Thank you, and happy aromantic awareness week.

so recently i decided 2 go back and read the 1st peter pan book now as an adult and hav concluded that peter is awful and hook was right 2 want 2 kill him in this essay i will,,, ok but fr tho let's begin w/ other stuff aside from that, 1 of the things i was *not* expecting was that from the way J M Barry wrote hook,,, hook was black, he's constantly described as "the black pirate" and also was described w/ an old timey word 2 mean "some1 who has a dark complexion" so basically disney whitewashed captain hook and then every1 else copied disney's design so now every1 thinks hook was white, not relevant 2 the point im making here but i thought it was interesting

ok so now the actual bs peter pan is a over 100 year old pedo, hook in the story was said 2 b black beard's bo'sun which means that peter has been around since b4 then [will explain y b4 then and not at the same time l8r] now this book [peter and wendy] was published in 1911 according 2 the website im using 2 read it [bc i rly don't feel comfortable owning a copy of a book written by an alleged pedo] [c also J M Barry's other work where he wrote a book 4 a family who he was friends w/ abt their irl baby being stripped naked as a gift] and i also no longer hav the audio cassettes of the book i had as a kid and even if i did i don't hav any way 2 play the audio, however if peter is alive in 1911 and was also alive when hook was a child and bo'sun 2 black beard [yes some bo'sun's were children due 2 kids being enlisted in the navy and having 2 run away and a bo'sun is a job where they would just report 2 the captain if any of the crew was doing anything they weren't supposed 2 so this makes sense] peter would at this point b over 100 years old since the golden age of piracy was somewhere in the early 1600s and blackbeard himself died in 1718 according 2 google, so even if we're being generous and say that hook joined peter in 1718 that would still mean he met peter almost 200 years ago

so now onto y i think hook was younger than peter i don't remember 4 sure which book it was in [the 1st book, the 2nd or peter pan in scarlet] but i remember something abt the pirates being the lost boys that peter got bored of that grew up, which would suggest that all the pirates [hook included] were once lost boys, i am choosing 2 stick w/ this given that it is very in character 4 peter, 4 example in the 1st book it's stated that as well as killing the pirates [yes, killing, not fighting and "defeating" them] he also kills lost boys, this is shown by the book saying he "thins the heard" and then again when tootles tells peter 2 kill him and the only reason he doesn't is that wendy stops him

so what makes me think peter is a pedo? i can think of off the top of my head [from what i hav re-read of the 1st book] -a line where it is said that peter "does something" 2 the kids 2 make them fit their trees -peter pan's name being based on a word that was at the time a kid word 4 penis -him sharing a bed w/ all the lost boys and there being a "strict rule against turning w/out giving a signal at which all of them would turn" [which kinda implies they r all spooning] -peter being the father and wendy the mother -his constant flirting w/ wendy -hook being thankful 2 hav gone into the hideout "unmolested" [which suggests that he was by peter when hook was a lost boy] -the bit where wendy asks for a type of flower called "babies" for her house they r building around her and the lost boys not knowing that this is a type of flower and knowing peter doesn't either "rush to start singing again before peter orders babies" so basically they knew that peter would demand for them 2 try 2 make babies if they didn't stop him

aside from that peter is also just abusive even if u don't agree w/ me abt him being a pedo [again just what I remember off the top of my head from book 1] -despite what the films say, in the book his imaginary meals only made him feel full but he hit those that didn't play along -as mentioned previously he kills lost boys -he hits the fairies -he kills pirates even when they aren't going anywhere near him "for fun" -the lost boys "aren't allowed 2 know anything peter doesn't know abt" -2 make the lost boys look different from him he makes them make clothes out of bearskin from bears they hav 2 kill themselves

so yeh peter pan was awful and hook was right 2 try 2 kill him given that peter was just kidnapping children and then doing all this bs

ppl rly do like 2 say that every disabled character in a queer relationship is child coded huh?