97 posts
Jsbtruth - Untitled - Tumblr Blog
☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️
If he gets on the witness stand the ANL will destroy him, period. It won't even be about the case itself they don't care about that. They will use it to make a fool of him, to bring back not only old stories but the ones he brought up in the book. They will make him talk about his drug use, they will make him talk about his family's privacy... and they don't even need the best lawyer, anyone who can string more than two sentences together and has a minimum of active listening skills will end him in 5 minutes.
People keep talking about Charles saying he's busy, did anyone think perhaps the brf own lawyers intervened here because any conversation he had with his son this week would likely mention this lawsuit, and he would use it to his benefit? A simple "ah yes son, I hope it works for you" could get him in trouble. I mean yeah he probably doesn't want to see him either, but he's not just daddy anymore and that's going to be a huge factor that will influence their relationship from now on...
...which brings me to my next point: Harry, Meghan, their lawyers and their advisers (if there are any of them left) have no idea how the monarchy works, AT ALL. You don't casually walk into BP to see the king even if he's your dad, you don't get to change plans that have been set for months by throwing a tantrum, you don't get to live in crown property (or to wear crown jewelry for that matter) when you have publicly shared details and photographs of crown properties. But is worse than that because apparently they don't know how the press works either, which is ironic considering how much time they dedicate to read through it. The brf rarely sues because they're afraid yes, afraid of the circus the ANL and any other would create if they gave them the opportunity, and all the private info that they managed to cover to protect some members for decades (including him and Meghan) coming out. How this man doesn't see that his crussade will only bring out more of his and his wife's shit out to the public sphere is beyond me. How long before the DM gets one of her bullied staff to talk with a big enough check to cover the breach of the NDA? How long before his teachers come out in public to confirm he cheated? How long before one of his old friends gets tired and opens his mouth? Is he even friends with Pelly anymore?
Anyways this is the longest ask in history but my conclusion is: he's fucked up big time this year and it's all downhill from here. They won't get much off the coronation and that's the last big royal event (for them) for a long time, the lawsuits will destroy the last of his reputation and Meghan... well I don't want to say it because there's children involved but we all see it anyways 🤐
This is brilliant. Hope it gets shared
As a mother of two children with a learning disability, I've often wondered about Haz. After reading parts of Spare, it's free to read through readanybook.com, I am pretty convinced he does. It not only explains his behavior and school experience. Both of my kids struggled with reading and reading retention. Haz, by his own admissions, hated reading. He said that it often bored him depending on the subject. My two were the same way. The way he described his gap year working on a ranch tells me he is more of a hands-on person. Another sign of a learning disability. My guess, either, he was so borderline it was never caught or because of who he is, a blind eye was turned by the educators, who would have been trained to know the signs. One last thought, Beatrice is diagnosed with dyslexia and it has been shown to run in families.
I'll always remember her talking in one of her interviews saying something along the lines of William being extremely intelligent (and in the same breath) that PH was thick like herself? Which I thought was harsh of her to make that comment. - well, based on how H's behaving, she wasn't wrong.... (still not okay for a mom to say publicly about her kid tho)
*
Credit to Quora and The Markles
Fox News has already called her out over her narcissism and lies.
One way or another, Meghan will get herself into hot water with her supporters here in the States. It will either be the podcast, netflix series, or both. She's way too tone deaf for it to go unnoticed for long with her left leaning and woke supporters who are always hyper aware of racism or elitism. She won't be "cancelled" or dragged because they rarely do that to their own, but I do expect more to call her out regularly and then eventually stop bothering with her. Mark my words.
Death by a thousand self-inflicted cuts.
This is a VERY illuminating thread. I've always wondered "Why Rose? Why her specifically?" I am absolutely not surprised that several connections to Smeggers are mentioned....Soho House, Lainey Lu, the crying make up artist.
Any additional thoughts out there in Tumblr world?
Also.....Rose is savage. 😈😈😈😈
Reblog
Kudos!!!! Reblog
You just need to look at the Harkles actions during and after Prince Philips funeral - Madam H scaled the heights of tackiness and had PR brief about HER wreath released as the Duke was being transported to the Jeep. And Master H did more swerving when they left the church so he would at the very least be in touching distance of his brother and sister-in-law, and Catherine’s innate politeness wouldn’t let her blank him. The the cherry on the top of their disgusting behaviour was when he let it be known (you know to those nasty media types he keeps suing) that the family were ‘frosty’ with him. Personally I thought they all showed remarkable restraint in not lining up to slap him.
Sometimes it’s better just to let people go, yes we are going to get endless PR about their happy lives away from the unapologetic RF. The UK has been through two years of financial, medical, and social hell, and what exactly have the Harkles done to help improve the situation? (his privilege, status and social advantages come from a family that the uk pay for) I would argue that they do nothing that isn’t attached to self promotion and fiscal advancement, and it doesn’t matter how vocal their half dozen ‘supporters’ are, the vast majority of the public don’t want them back. Ultimately Charles and William have to protect the Crown, and it doesn’t take a genius to work out that the negative response to them in a private family setting would be dwarfed by any plan for them/him to return as a working Royal. Harry torched those bridges and there is no coming back no matter how many Sunshine Sachs press releases they churn out. If he regrets his actions ‘tough’ that’s what being a grown up means, you live with the consequences of your actions and move on, just like his family have since he left.
This
Reblog
Few things I like about Meghan, she puts herself first, she’s driven and utterly shameless (all in a bad way. But still). I wish I had a fraction of her narcissism tendencies because I could do better in my life.
It makes me sad she’s demonic because she could have become a great duchess. It also makes me sad that she didn’t unlocked who she is as a person or what true self fulfillment is because she’ll never be happy or loved or a decent f human being. She is destined to fight with her own children, be jealous of a future princess of Wales and having to pretend she’s loving her pathetic unattractive beta husband (or the future husband number 3).
The rest I absolutely detest. She’s one of the worst celebs I ever seen in my life, second only to people like Elizabeth Holmes. Shes right there with totalitarian leaders when it comes to her character. She’s vile, cruel, enjoys others suffering, selfish, abusive, toxic, dangerous and I don’t think she’s capable of loving another person in the true sense of the word. I feel like I had to sum up because I lost all interest in her as a person, character, cartoon…whatever. She really isn’t worth writing about anymore because even her flops are repetitive, and I think she’s starting to see her star fade, hence the Ellen parade and the long lost royal talk she keeps pushing.
I had no idea she’ll downgraded so hard so fast when she left in 2019 but damn..she’s right there in the reality tv stars when it comes to actual star power or desirability factor. Harry used to look so bland next to her which was part of her agenda to lift herself up but now she’s just as basic and uninteresting as he is. Meh
Reblog
I read the tweet about JH having concerns and yet it appears that he still chose to accept that 50k donation? So he was suspicious yet he took the money? 🤷🏻♀️
From Rebecca English's new article:
Indeed, I understand that Charles wasn’t even aware until this weekend that his son had met Mahfouz in a west London pub, let alone encouraged his charity to accept any money from him.
If Harry was that concerned about the Saudi billionaire, surely he could have warned his father, possibly when he saw him at his London residence the same day.
It was also no secret, subsequently, that Mahfouz had become a major donor to Charles’ charitable endeavours – he had a wood named after him at Dumfries House, the Scottish seat of his charitable empire, after all.
Contrary to claims in the BBC’s recent controversial documentary on royals and the media that the three royal households are all too quick ‘brief’ against each other, Clarence House was again maintaining a dignified silence last night.
But one loyal friend of the Prince of Wales felt obliged to ask: ‘If Harry indeed had such deep concern about this man and his “motives”, then why on earth did he not tell his charity, Sentebale, to just hand the £50,000 he had given them back?’
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-10277675/Prince-Harry-throws-father-bus.html
👏👏👏👏👏 reblog
The Unfair Hate Towards Prince William
⚠️Any name calling or inappropriate comments about anyone will be hidden and you will be blocked. Constructive comments only!
1. William wasn’t the one who refused to allow Meghan to seek help for her mental health struggles. We know this because…
1.) Harry said himself he didn’t tell his family what was going on because he was “ashamed.” And William isn’t a mind reader.
2.) The Queen and Prince Charles are the decision makers of the family and outrank William on everything. William is only in charge of Kensington Palace, which does not have its own set of doctors so Harry didn’t need to get William’s approval for Meghan to get treatment. Harry needed The Queen’s and Charles’ approvals because they are the ones who are in charge.
3.) In January of 2019, Kate’s brother James revealed that he struggled with depression with thoughts of suicide and shared that his family (including Kate) accompanied him in therapy. It doesn’t make sense that William and Kate would’ve refused to help Meghan get similar help after they encouraged James to publicly share his story.
4.) Harry told Oprah that he “felt really let down” by his father because Charles went through something similar (with Diana’s mental health struggles). Harry never insinuated that William let him down like he did about Charles.
5.) In South Africa, Harry said that he knows William “will always be there for him” just as “he will always be there for William”. He said this after Archie was born and Meghan said she sought help while she was pregnant. This suggests that William was not the one who refused to help get her treatment because Harry wouldn’t have said this if William had been the one who refused to help him.
2. There’s no evidence suggesting that William was the one who commented about Archie’s skin tone.
1.) The comment was made before Archie was either conceived or born (we don’t know since Harry and Meghan’s versions of the conversation are different). Harry made it a point in both the SA interview and the Oprah interview to say that he loves William. On the other hand, he talked about Charles saying he feels “really let down” by his father.
2.) To Oprah, Harry made the comment, “…and Archie is his grandson.” Which, reading between the lines, meant that Harry doesn’t feel Charles is making enough of an effort to know Archie. This implies that Harry’s issues and sensitivities regarding his son not being treated fairly come from Charles, not from William.
3.) Meghan implied that race was a reason why Archie didn’t get a title. William is not the monarch or the Prince of Wales meaning he is not the one making decisions regarding who gets royal titles. This conversation would’ve been with The Queen and Prince Charles, not with William.
4.) William was criticized for his comment that the Royal family is “not a racist family,” because as a white man he doesn’t get to decide what is racist or not, which is true. However, William had every right to be upset about the way these accusations were made for something as serious as racism. Harry and Meghan created a case of “who done it” in which everyone in the family was questioned and accused without any evidence. Meaning innocent people were unfairly accused and then labeled as racists. For someone in Charles and William’s positions this refusal to name the one member of the family was very damaging and cruel because now they’re unfairly being accused of something extremely serious without any evidence and are not able to publicly defend themselves.
3. William giving permission to Jason Knauf to provide a witness statement.
1.) We don’t know for sure if this is actually true. This is just what royal reporters are assuming. It’s highly likely Jason at least had a conversation with William and told him about it out of respect but since Jason is leaving his position in the royal household he ultimately doesn’t need William’s approval.
2.) Jason was Meghan’s Communications Secretary who’s job was to communicate with the press on her behalf. Meghan’s lie that the palace perpetuated falsehoods and refused to protect her against the press is the same as accusing Jason of not doing his job properly. This gives Jason the motivation for giving a witness statement so that he can provide evidence defending his reputation from her lies.
3.) Jason never intended to get involved. Before the Oprah interview, Jason had been approached to provide a witness statement and he declined. It was only after Meghan claimed the palace didn’t defend her that Jason finally agreed to provide a witness statement. It’s likely that Meghan’s lies made him want to correct the narrative, especially after she discredited the victims who have accused her of bullying them, which we know Jason witnessed since he was the one who reported his concerns.
4.) All William did was give his employee permission to be honest in court. And Harry and Meghan are so against misinformation that they really shouldn’t have an issue with someone correcting a false narrative in court. Just because it’s against them shouldn’t make a difference in the importance of tackling misinformation.
5.) Meghan lied to the high court and Jason proved it. Why are you more upset that Jason told the truth (and provided evidence) than you are about Meghan outright lying to both the High Court and Oprah Winfrey?
6.) And how is William giving an aide permission to tell the truth in court (which happens to expose Meghan’s lies) a bigger betrayal than Meghan and Harry doing a sit down interview in which they spread misinformation and even outright lied numerous times about Harry’s entire family?
4. Scobie accused William and the palace of “leaking stories” about Meghan to the press. He said, “There's been rumours for quite some time that a lot of the most damaging and negative stories have come from other royal households or from other royal aides. From my own research and reporting that's exactly true.”
1.) What Scobie failed to see in his “research” is that the most damaging stories about Meghan that circulated in the press did not come from palace leaks.
Bullying accusations—Valentine Low confirmed that the sources were the victims themselves and William was not involved. Furthermore, the bullying accusations certainly do not make the palace or royal family look good since it means they ignored reports of bullying in the workplace. These reports have been circulating since 2018 and resurfaced after the previews for the Oprah interview came out showing Meghan putting all the blame for her troubles on the palace. (If you were bullied and then you saw your bully go on national television and accuse you of mistreating them, you’d be furious. So it makes sense why the accusations resurfaced just before the full interview aired).
Bridesmaid Dress Fitting—Camilla Tominey was the one who first broke the story and she still stands by her original story that Meghan made Kate cry even after Meghan gave her version. Camilla confirmed that her sources were witnesses to the situation and that she has never been briefed by the Palace.
Tiara drama—this involved Buckingham Palace, not Kensington Palace. So the leaks would have come from either Meghan’s own staff or the Queen’s staff, but not from William.
Kate telling off Meghan for being rude to her staff —The palace issued a statement denying this by stating “This never happened.”
Kate and Meghan feud—the palace publicly denied there was a feud. Kate also invited Meghan to Wimbledon with her in both 2018 and 2019. Meghan said, “nothing was what it looked like,” however Kate extending these public invitations to Meghan was a positive attempt to show the world that there was no feud between the two and that the rumors were not true.
Over the top baby shower—this played out in the public and the US media. According to Emily Andrews, Omid Scobie was the first reporter to break the news.
Wimbledon—this played out in public and involved members of the public who then spoke directly to the press.
Wardrobe costs—this information is public and can be found on fashion blogs.
Refusing to name Archie’s godparents—while I agree that H&M had every right to keep Archie’s godparents private, the criticism was a response from the public and didn’t come from leaks.
Private jet usage—this criticism was a result of Harry preaching about sustainable travel while enjoying private jets for himself. Blaming William for Harry’s bad press is just deflecting from Harry’s hypocrisy.
Markle family drama—the royal family was concerned about Thomas speaking to the press and wanted Harry and Meghan to fly to Thomas’ home to sort things out in person, but they refused and Meghan accused the royals of “berating” her husband. The royals tried to prevent what is happening from happening.
Harry offering Meghan to do voiceover work to Disney CEO—this was captured on video by the press at a public event. It also upset Marines after Harry chose to attend the movie premiere instead of a memorial for fallen Marines taking place that same night.
Disrespecting The Queen—most people can understand why Harry and Meghan hate the press and wanted out of the royal fish bowl. What people don’t support is the way they went about it. We know Harry blindsided the Queen when he announced his departure because Harry also announced the new part time role he created for himself which the Queen later rejected which shows that he made the announcement without her consent. Harry said he didn’t disrespect the Queen but he did and his own behavior confirmed it, not palace leaks. Family and loyalty are valued by the public and Harry’s public disrespect to his grandmother is what got him criticism.
Excessive belly cupping articles—these were images of Meghan in the public and were not from leaks.
*I’m not saying I agree with all of these criticisms, I’m just pointing out that they were the biggest criticisms of Meghan and Harry that were not from palace leaks.
2.) Harry and Meghan are very involved in press affairs, although they try to make it seem like they’re not.
Harry and Meghan hired Sunshine Sachs, a notorious PR firm known for being ruthless (and even unethical) when protecting their clients (like how they publicly discredited the victims of their client Harvey Weinstein).
Meghan’s BFF was accused of trying to influence a story about Meghan in the press.
Omid Scobie was the reporter who first broke the news about the baby shower according to Emily Andrews.
Meghan’s five friends were the ones who first mentioned Meghan’s private letter to the public.
Harry was the one who talked to American journalist Gayle King about private phone calls with his dad and brother.
Meghan’s side were the ones who were busted by the judge for leaking court information to Omid Scobie.
Harry and Meghan were the ones who went on international television to slander their own family while knowing their family could never share their side of the story.
Meghan authorized her lawyers to speak on her behalf in the controversial BBC documentary about William and Harry. The palace was not even allowed to see the documentary prior to it airing but Meghan was allowed to have her lawyer speak in it.
It’s obvious that Meghan and her friends gave info for the Finding Freedom book. Very personal stories were shared that could only have come from Meghan herself (like her private date with Harry when she peed in the woods). She has no problem suing the press over false stories and the fact that she didn’t sue the authors of this biography (which literally told private stories from her point of view and her inner thoughts) speaks volumes.
5. Harry insinuated that William and Kate were “jealous” of him and Meghan. People then use this as William’s “motivation” for attacking Harry and Meghan through the press.
1.) Harry and Meghan had just gotten married and were on their first overseas tour during which they announced they were pregnant. It’s no surprise that they attracted a huge amount of attention given how much people love marriage and babies. They were at the peak of their popularity. However, this popularity was not greater than William and Kate’s in any significant way. William and Kate’s visits generated thousands of well wishers when traveling overseas and William and Kate have always been very popular in the UK. The Cambridge kids have also always been more popular than Harry and Meghan.
2.) Harry said everything changed for the worse after the Pacific tour and insinuated that jealousy came from the palace after seeing how successful Harry and Meghan’s pacific tour was. However, Harry conveniently overlooked that William and Kate had just as successful tours when they toured in the Pacific in both 2012 and 2014. As well as Canada in 2011 and 2016. And Poland and Germany in 2017 and Ireland in 2020.
3.) Looking at the timeline, the events match up perfectly to support the reason that things actually changed for the worse because of the bullying accusations rather than jealousy. Jason Knauf emailed William’s private secretary informing him of the bullying concerns in October of 2018…which means William first became aware of the accusations the same month as the Pacific tour.
4.) One of the reasonings that people use to prove that William and Kate were jealous is how they’ve “upped their game” since Meghan joined the family. However, William and Kate’s increased workload has more to do with the timeline than it does with Harry and Meghan. William worked as a full time search and rescue pilot up until July of 2017 and it wasn’t until early 2018 that William really embraced life as a full time royal. This coincided with Meghan’s entrance into the royal family.
5.) Harry and Meghan do have a greater interest in the press and public but not because they are so much better than William and Kate. It’s because William and Kate are “boring” and don’t cause drama. William and Kate didn’t disobey The Queen, sue the press or do multiple sit down interviews like Harry and Meghan have. Drama always generates more attention. But attention does not always equal popularity or respect.
6.) William has never been jealous of Harry’s popularity and has always protected him in the press. The idea that William would intentionally cause his younger brother pain is ridiculous when you look at William’s past behavior towards Harry.
William and Harry’s former private secretary, Miguel Head shared a story about how William stood up mid press conference and put a stop to it after William saw how much Harry was struggling after returning home from his deployment in Afghanistan in 2008. Someone who doesn’t care for their younger brother wouldn’t have done this. “It was the first time I realized, that I saw with my own eyes, the closeness of the relationship between the two brothers. Think about the mixed emotions Prince William would have had, because he wasn’t allowed…he never got to go. So he would have known how Prince Harry felt, and he was very protective of him. So Prince Harry comes off his aircraft, and he’s exhausted. He hasn’t washed for a day and a half. He’s still wearing what he was wearing in the desert in Afghanistan. He still has sand all over him. And so he’s really tired; he slept overnight on the plane. And he’s also just deeply upset. The interviewer and the producer start asking the pre-agreed questions…We get about two questions into this list of questions, and Prince William suddenly stands up. He’s at the back of the room — he stood kind of behind me. He stands up and does a cutting motion with his hand across his throat, saying, this is over. It was simply a brother realizing that at that point nothing was more important than his welfare, and none of the other agreements mattered at that point. And it says something about the closeness of the two brothers and their authenticity, as well. They will not fake who they are simply to play a game or to go along with other people’s expectations. And they are perfectly courteous and loyal and they will abide by agreements up to a point. But there will come a point where they say, “Well, actually our humanity is more important.” And so I look at Prince William. I look at the broadcasters. And I think, I have a split-second choice here. Do I go with this very carefully calibrated agreement with the broadcasters and just say to Prince William, “No, I’m sorry; this has got to continue?” Or, do I go with Prince William, who is going to be the king one day? This is the first time I’ve ever met him, and at that point I had no idea, by the way, that I’d ever work for him. And then I looked at Prince Harry and thought, you’re exhausted. This is not the time or the place for you to be here doing an interview. And so I did something I’ve never done any other time in my career. I stood up and said, “Thank you very much, gentlemen. This is over.” Prince Harry looked at me. I remember the relief in his face. And he left the room. And I got screamed at — I mean, literally screamed at, particularly by the BBC producer.”
In 2009, Harry was training for his helicopter wings at the same RAF base William was training to be a search and rescue pilot. During a joint interview a reporter made a comment that diminished Harry’s skills to which William immediately jumped in defending Harry and emphasizing how well he was doing. A jealous person wouldn’t have done that.
During their visit to Africa in 2010, William visited Harry’s Sentebale charity and during an interview he talked about how proud he was of Harry and how he was a “star” and how loved he was. This doesn’t sound like someone who’s jealous.
In 2017, Harry revealed in a podcast interview with The Telegraph that three years prior (around 2014) William was the one who encouraged him to talk more about their mum and go to therapy. Harry even said, “My brother, bless him, he was a huge support to me.”
Reporters admitted to giving William and Kate bad press around 2016 because they were upset about William and Kate not giving them enough access or good enough photographs. Harry, on the other hand, was getting great press at the time and there was no jealousy coming from William. William always included Harry in everything and they were known as the royal trio. William could’ve left Harry out of Heads Together since Kate was the one who came up with the idea, but he didn’t. William and Kate could’ve made Harry walk solo during events but they didn’t. They have never been jealous of Harry. William has always been proud and happy to see Harry succeed (like he was with Sentebale and Invictus Games and when he was caught grinning saying, “there’s your girl,” to Harry when they first saw Meghan walking down the aisle).
6. William has his own life and family to focus on and doesn’t obsess over everything Harry and Meghan do.
Family—Raising three young children is a lot of work. Meghan joined the family right after the birth of Louis. William and Kate were rightfully more focused on their children than they were about anything and anyone else. During the pregnancy, both William and Kate on separate occasions joked to crowds about how William was freaking out about having three kids. We also know he was supporting Kate with her brother’s mental health struggles.
Full time royal duties—visits with his patronages and his work with wildlife conservation and advocating for mental health.
Earthshot Prize—William founded this project towards the end of 2018 and it has been the core of his royal work since then. Based on the court circular entries and the huge scale of the recent Awards ceremony we know William has put a lot of time into this.
Duchy of Cornwall—William has actively been getting more involved in the Duchy as Charles takes on more duties for the Queen. William has taken additional coursework to learn about agricultural leadership and he regularly attends duchy meetings.
Royal tours—before the pandemic, William was taking very highly sensitive royal tours in the Middle East at the request of the British government. These tours take months of planning and preparations because of the highly sensitive diplomatic relations in the region and one wrong move could had huge implications on the UK.
7. William has always been against “press games.”
1.) Hasnat Khan (Diana’s lover) revealed that William hated Diana doing the Panorama interview and even was the one who ultimately got Diana to cut ties with Bashir.
2.) Simone Simmons (Diana’s close friend) also revealed how upset William was with Diana after she gave the Panorama interview because he was so embarrassed that the family drama was made public and the bullying he endured because of it.
3.) In the 2017 BBC documentary “Diana, 7 Days”, William said, "I can understand, having sometimes been in those situations, you feel incredibly desperate and it is very unfair that things are being said that are untrue. The easiest thing to do is just to say or go to the media yourself. Open that door. But once you've opened it you can never close it again."
4.) William was deeply affected by Diana’s media games she played with the press and he’s seen the repercussions and consequences of playing those games. He saw it destroy Diana’s life and he knew even at age 13 that you can’t beat the press at their own game. There has to be a boundary with the press because if you let them cross it (such as by leaking stories) you can never get that line back. Leaking negative stories about his brother in order to get positive press coverage for himself would be opening that door.
5.) William suffered the most during the “War of the Waleses” when Charles and Diana leaked information on each other to get better press. William wouldn’t put his children (or nephew) in the position to suffer the same way he did by leaking negative stories about their uncle and aunt.
6.) It has always been said that William is very paranoid about who he lets into his inner circle for fear of confidants leaking info to the press. He apparently has even tested for moles by giving false information to see if it ends up in the press and is known to have cut off friendships if he suspects them speaking to the press. He reportedly did it to Tom Bradby after news about a project he was working on came out that only Tom was aware of. It later was revealed that the information came from the phone hacking and that Tom did not betray William’s trust. And William then chose Tom to be the interviewer for his engagement interview in 2010.
7.) The monarch needs to have a good relationship with the press. It’s for this reason that William has reached out to editors in regards to his royal work. He’s not getting along with the press because he wants to. It’s because he has to as the future king. It has nothing to do with Harry and Meghan and certainly does not mean he’s leaking stories about them to the press.
William’s cooperation with the press protects his wife and children from being hounded by the paparazzi like Diana was. The palace has a deal with the press that in exchange for exclusive access on royal events and projects, the press will not publish paparazzi phots which significantly reduces the demand and monetary value of the photos. If William were to turn back on the deal like Harry did then William’s children will suffer the most from it because they would no longer have that protection. Harry has rejected the deal in order to keep his family face and William has accepted the deal in order to keep his family safe. It doesn’t mean William supports the press’s behavior or is leaking stories about his brother to get getter press for himself.
8. Most of the hate towards William is based on assumptions and speculations that have no real evidence of being true. William is not an awful, racist bully like some people want him to be. If you follow him and his work you’d see that he is actually the opposite.
1.) The very first patronage he chose was the homeless charity Centrepoint which helps homeless young people of all backgrounds. William promised a young homeless woman who aspired to be a journalist that she could interview him, which she did in 2016. William also did a photoshoot in 2010 with a formerly homeless photographer and invited another formerly homeless photographer to Kensington Palace to take his photos in 2016.
2.) William was a search and rescue pilot for the RAF and later worked full time for the East Anglian Air Ambulance during which he donated his entire salary to charity. While he was out literally saving lives, the press accused him of being “lazy” because he wasn’t carrying out as many royal engagements. When he was asked in an interview about he feels about the criticism he received of him not working enough, instead of defending himself by bragging that he was out saving lives, William simply said, “It’s part of the job.”
3.) In 2015, Prince William was part of a campaign against the illegal wildlife trade in China and even was able to get a meeting with the Chinese president who later banned the trade.
4.) In 2018, William called out tech companies for not taking action against the misinformation and cyber bullying taking place on their platforms.
5.) With his Earthshot Prize he is using his platform to connect bright and hardworking scientists with investors and global leaders. William brought the nominees from all over the world to the COP26 in Glasgow to network and meet investors and he even arranged for one of them (a 15 year old girl from India) to give a speech to world leaders. The nominees got these incredible opportunities because William used his platform to make sure they got the recognitions and support they deserve.
Is William perfect? Of course not. He’s human. He’s made dumb comments and has been ignorant at times but he’s not a bad person. He’s doing his best to help others, protect his wife/children, support his grandmother and shoulder the huge responsibility and burden of the monarchy that he was raised to protect. He’s in a position (that he didn’t choose to be in) with a lot of pressure that none of us will ever understand.
⚠️P.S. Any name calling or inappropriate comments about anyone will be hidden and you will be blocked. Constructive comments only!
With all the Sussex supporters alluding to this in the past, this will be like an early Christmas present.
Doctored image of 'abused' Kate Middleton in domestic violence campaign was used without Palace permission
Yikes!!!! Reblog
Just a reminder: Jenny Afia is sole Director of Tsessebe Ltd. and PH is the person with significant control of this company.. Linda
Yes, interesting isn’t it.....❤️❤️❤️❤️
Me three!
I'm being petty but now I want to see emails btw Mm/H and Jason about- 1. M being asked to wear a hat with HM on train tour and she ignores that. 2. M being about the avocado stories. 3. M pestering Jason to clarify the "M made K cry at flower girl dress fitting " story and Jason refusing to do so. 4. M telling Jason about keep Vogue a secret 5. M demanding the passwords to the insta account 6. Any correspondence abt the people article and it's aftermath.
Me too!
‼️‼️PLEASE HELP ME FIND MY LITTLE BROTHER!! THIS IS AN EMERGENCY‼️‼️
He’s a missing native child and at EXTREME RISK! The cops aren’t doing SHIT!
BOOST, DONATE, & SHARE
Bravo 👏👏👏👏👏
Woke is the roar of smug, entitled mediocrities everywhere: The insanity of a world where Thomas The Tank Engine, craft beers and even country walks are branded racist drives
By JULIE BURCHILL FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY
PUBLISHED: 22:01 BST, 23 October 2021 | UPDATED: 09:37 BST, 24 October 2021
Prince Harry’s father, Prince Charles (perhaps the grandaddy of Woke, with his mutterings on this and that), has long exemplified my observation: ‘It’s no wonder that the wealthy are friends of the Earth – it’s been a damn good friend to them’
None of these ‘Green’ hypocrites could hold a hand-poured soy wax vegan Highgrove candle to their kingpin, the Prince of Wales, who in 2007 flew first class to America – with an entourage of 20 people – to collect an environmental award. And then, two years later, used a private jet on an ‘environmental’ tour of South America, costing approximately £300,000 for a 16,000-mile trip. Say what you like about Prince Harry’s parentage, in this department he certainly seems to be a chip off the old blockhead.
Prince Charles has an actress chum, too. Emma Thompson (the grandmother of Woke) flew in first class from Los Angeles to London to join the Extinction Rebellion protests of spring 2019 – a 5,456-mile transatlantic flight that stomped out a three-ton carbon footprint. Extinction Rebellion, which demands that flights be used only in emergencies, simpered that Dame Emma’s jaunt was ‘an unfortunate cost in our bigger battle to save the planet’.
In short, Green – like Wokeness itself – is the first socio-political movement in which every mover and shaker ranges from well-off to filthy rich.
Between 2017 and 2019 I had a rather embarrassing crush on Meghan Markle
Meghan has never waited soppily for some prince to rescue her,’ I wrote in one magazine. ‘In fact, it seems far likelier that it is she who will rescue the prince.’ CRINGE! as the youngsters say. Thankfully, I was swiftly thoroughly disillusioned.
‘Harry and Meghan took four private jets in 11 days after a summer of lecturing us about climate change; this followed shortly after the Prince’s jaunt to the Google climate change summit where he is also thought to have taken a helicopter, as he habitually uses them to fly short distances whereas the Queen makes do with a train,’ I scribbled in another article. Having Elton John rush in to defend them didn’t help, but only further established that the Sussexes saw themselves as international stars rather than one nation’s public servants.’
Shortly after hearing that Meghan planned to semi-retire from Royal duties in order to spend more time with her merchandising, I coined the phrase the ‘Grabdication’ (grabbing the limelight, grabbing the status, grabbing the cash) and my rehabilitation was complete.
The Grabdication was another Woke event, along with the Gender Recognition Act and the Remoaner refusal to accept Brexit, which while appearing to be liberal was actually the opposite.
The Grabdication told peasants that princes may do as they wish with no regard to public opinion
We’d been on this ‘do-as-I-say- not-as-I-fly’ bumpy ride before, of course; Prince Harry’s father, Prince Charles (perhaps the grandaddy of Woke, with his mutterings on this and that), has long exemplified my observation: ‘It’s no wonder that the wealthy are friends of the Earth – it’s been a damn good friend to them.’ The idea of a pre-industrial Eden – the rich man in his castle, the poor man at his gate – has fuelled the righteous fury of aristocrats against capitalism since the late 1960s.
Meghan couldn’t keep away from the US, and it soon became clear exactly why she had left her husband’s home country, dragging the poor sap behind her. She didn’t want to be out of the limelight – she just wanted a different kind of limelight.
The American-born, London-based Royal commentator Ashley Pearson provided a piquant comment which certainly rang true, considering the peevishness which emanated from the couple as soon as the honeymoon was over: ‘She had no idea how unglamorous it really is to be a Royal and, when she found out she would be a civil servant in a tiara, she was, like, “No way.’’ ’ Which brings us right back to the Grabdication, when a heady blend of wealth, celebrity and Wokeness reached its shining peak, and it was briefly Camelot for Meghan and Harry, the fraudulent monarchs of a fraudulent movement: the First Couple of Woke.
From the September 2019 issue of Vogue, edited by none other than Me-Again herself, to the moment they were revealed as the only people apart from Greta Garbo ever to move to Hollywood because they wanted to be left alone, they could do no wrong.
And then the Grabdication went bust, and was revealed as being as morally bankrupt as the celebrity and the Wokeness which had spawned it, with a whole nasty level of its own because the three belief systems had never been seen in the same place before.
The Sussexes’ more-in-sorrow-than-in-anger faces stopped selling magazines as we shied away from yet another showboating photo-op of them handing out food to the poor. Their popularity plummeted, with a YouGov poll showing that they were only marginally more popular than Princess Anne’s corgi-killing dog Dotty.
Never mind – they’ll have their multi-million-dollar Netflix deal to keep them warm until the Americans realise there’s nothing special about them without the musty tinge of monarchy – which will surely evaporate quickly when that blinding Pacific sunshine is let in upon the magic.
Comment: A very long article which also encompasses politics and racism so I have just blogged the RF part. Access to complete article via header link
So my Reddit account has been permanently suspended for breaking the rules...funny story...I can't remember the last time I logged into Reddit. I honestly have no clue what they are even talking about. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Reblog
JAN MOIR: Move over Cinderella, here's Meghan's fairy tale
Dear Leader Charles Schumer and Speaker Nancy Pelosi — I’m not an elected official, not yet anyway. I’m not a politician either, but watch this space.
I am, like many, an engaged citizen and a plugged-in parent. I am also a Duchess, did I mention that? Check out the letterhead; Duke and D-U-C-H-E-S-S of Sussex. Duchess. Rhymes with success. Don’t ever forget that.
I’m writing to you at this deeply important time — as a mom and an everyday global icon — to advocate for paid leave for parents. No family should have to choose between earning a living and having the freedom to take care of their child.
That is why everyone should try to marry into a Royal Family if possible, complete with a father-in-law who can be tapped for millions, in addition to the magnificent sums he has already bequeathed upon his son. Prince Charles can rest assured that Harry and I are putting the monies to good use.
Together we have rescued chickens and given fresh purpose to private jet pilots hanging around LAX with nothing to do. It means so much to the little people that we don’t have to fly commercial.
And I am personally keeping the Cashmere Weavers of Montecito in business. Throw another goat on the loom, dudes! I need another five-ply poncho to visit and inspire marginalised children in an inner-city ghetto with my saviour complex and luxury woollens.
Let’s speak more of my truth. I started working (at the local frozen yoghurt shop) at the age of 13. It was there that I first discovered my deep love of culture. In addition, all those fro-yo flavours taught me about the beauty of diversity and how each flavour is unique and wonderful in its own way, just like human beings.
There’s Ginger Totally Nuts, the Flaky Waity Katy, the Royal Sour Lemons Bombe and my favourite, Just Say It Belongs To The Stylist. The more flavours on offer in a yoghurt bar the stronger that bar is — like society, right?
Dining out? Thought you’d never ask. I grew up living on the $4.99 salad bar at Sizzler, a popular restaurant chain in California. Times were tough. Once they ran out of the broccoli and tomato mix with soy-lime dressing, and I cried for days.
That was back when I lived in Les Miserables, in the leaky wooden shack on the wrong side of the tracks that my father laughingly called a ‘home’. I used to sleep in flour sacks and I cleaned my dresses — some might call them ‘rags’ — on a washboard in the coldwater kitchen.
It is no secret that I was born in the wagon of a travelling show, Mama used to dance for the money they’d throw, Papa would do whatever he could . . . no sorry, that’s Cher. I’m getting mixed up. I remember there was a church house, gin house. A school house, outhouse. On Highway Number Nineteen, where the people keep the city clean — no, wait! (Harry, have you been in my Cinderella File again? Idiot.)
All you have to know is that there’s a world outside your window and it’s a world of dread and fear, where the only water flowing is the . . . no hang on, where am I? I waited tables, babysat, and piecemealed jobs together to cover odds and ends. I worked all my life to make ends meet and to put gas in my car.
What has all this got to do with paid parental leave? Absolutely nothing, but I’m not missing this opportunity to lend support to a popular cause while burnishing my victim credentials on an international stage.
To depict myself as a plucky ragamuffin, an Orphan Annie who fought her way up from the crumbs on the breadline to the cherry on the cake. Even though I went to private school and my father was an award-winning Hollywood lighting designer who provided for me generously.
But let’s move on.
Many of our economic systems are past their expiration date, but luckily not hereditary privilege nor inherited titles. Being a Duchess and having this access to you comes courtesy of an ancient European monarchy which I purport to despise, but continue to use to my advantage; to live off and exploit in the most ethical way possible. Like I said, I used to dine at an all-you-can-eat salad bar, so that makes it OK, right?
Even those of us who live in mansions crammed with staff, gourmet kitchens and multiple nannies, can feel overwhelmed at the birth of a child and expansion of a family. That is why I am begging you to consider the paternity leave deals on offer in the land of Narnia, where birth-givers and their partners are given five years off on full pay until their children start school or marry a prince.
Listen. This isn’t about Right or Left, it’s about right or wrong. It’s about putting families above politics, although I obviously don’t mean my own blood family, who don’t understand compassion in action like me.
So, on behalf of Archie and Lili and Harry, I thank you for considering this letter and daring to dream a dream in time gone by, when hope was high and life worth living.
Vote for me. Thank you.
Reblog
While many people in the U.K. are upset with the way Prince Harry and Meghan Markle dissed the royal family, the Sussexes have become more popular in the U.S. since they moved to California last year.
However, Anthony Sabatini, a Republican member of the Florida House of Representatives, thinks the actress’ behavior is unacceptable.
Reblog
EXCLUSIVE: Republican tells Royal Family to STRIP Meghan Markle of her royal title for interfering in US politics: GOP Reps. tell ‘out-of-touch’ Duchess to ‘stick to acting’ and calls her 'Sizzler salad bar’ story 'laughable’
Meghan urges politicians to bring in paid parental leave as 'national right’ as Joe Biden’s bill heads to Senate
In her letter on Sussexes’ headed paper details growing up on a 4.99-dollar salad bar and first job at age 13
Critics point out Duchess was privately educated paid for her now estranged lighting director father Thomas
Royal experts say lobbying intervention is a new sign that Meghan has serious political ambitions in the US
By MARTIN ROBINSON CHIEF REPORTER FOR MAILONLINE and MORGAN PHILLIPS, POLITICS REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 23:56, 21 October 2021 | UPDATED: 23:56, 21 October 2021
Ms. Markle’s latest interference in U.S. politics reignites the question in my mind as to why the Royal Family does not simply strip her and Harry officially of their titles, particularly since she insists on sending this under the pretense of being the Duchess of Sussex,’ Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., told DailyMail.com.
'While her attempts at appealing to working class families by recalling her days of eating at Sizzler were laughable, her comments make crystal clear that the passage of this massive tax-and-spend bill is aimed more at helping global elites get huge tax breaks than helping the working families she claims to have dined with.'
The extraordinary 1,030-word letter to Pelosi and Schumer, both Democrats, is written on the Sussexes new post-royal letterhead, which prominently uses their titles but not their official cyphers. In one highly-political line, she says the US’s economic systems are 'past their expiration date’ and 'too many Americans are forced to shortchange themselves when it comes to what matters to them’.
Angela Levin, journalist and biographer of Prince Harry, told MailOnline that while the duchess is an American citizen, the letter from 'the office of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’ signed 'on behalf of my family, Archie and Lili and Harry’, amounts to using her British title and marriage to the sixth in line to the throne to interfere in US politics.
She said: 'Meghan’s two page letter to lobby Congress about giving money on parental leave, is obviously another step towards trying to turn herself into a politician. But the notepaper she is using is astonishingly 'From the Office of The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’ and shows how she isn’t even aware that she is talking to politicians in a republic that won its independence from the crown in 1776.
Prince Charles is known to have written to several US Presidents over the years, including Joe Biden, and also sent the so called ’Black Spider Letters’ to British government ministers and politicians over the years, but never in the same public way as Meghan’s missive to Schumer and Pelosi.
Comment - reading the full article via the header above I wonder if she is now marching for Sizzler bars
Finding Freedom: Prince Harry had ‘very special’ reunion with the Queen
The truth can never stay hidden....Reblog
https://blindgossip.com/pregnancy-story-2/#more-102769
Reblog and thanks!
Up close and personal: How it really feels to meet the Duchess of Cambridge January 10, 2021
Tears, blushes and blurting out ‘I’m speechless!’ – how it really feels to meet the Duchess, by the people who have.
The Mail on Sunday’s royal editor Emily Andrews has watched Kate blossom over the past ten years.
Kate and William celebrate Pancake Day while Emily Andrews looks on, Belfast, 2011. Image: Getty Images/Chris Jackson
‘Are you sure? Do you really think it suits me? I was a little hesitant.’ That was the surprising but endearingly honest reply when I complimented our future Queen on her new hairstyle. It was more than five years ago, after she’d had Princess Charlotte, that Kate debuted a new ‘mum fringe’. The most photographed – and photogenic – woman on the planet had had her hair cut, but even she was a little unsure.
She patted her hair and smiled gratefully as I reassured her that, yes, the new ‘do’ did indeed look fabulous. It was an intriguing insight that, despite her position, wealth, fame and gorgeous family, she shared the same worries and doubts as the rest of us.
And that, I think, is what has cemented the Duchess of Cambridge’s unassailable position as the linchpin of the modern Royal Family. She allows just enough daylight into her life, gives just enough to make her seem ‘one of us’, yet she is not. Or rather, she was. Once. Now marriage to Prince William gives her both a worldwide platform to effect change on whatever issue she chooses (plus unlimited dresses and jewels) but also the unstinting glare of the media spotlight. I first met Kate, or Catherine as she prefers to be called now, just after the Royal Wedding in 2011. Self-assured and extremely amusing in private (she has a wicked sense of humour), in public she initially seemed to struggle with nerves.Call it what you will: stage-fright, weight of expectation, never wanting to put an LK Bennett-shod foot wrong. The former Miss Middleton did not want to mess up, and that gave her a somewhat hesitant public persona.Public speaking did not come easily to her. She had voice coaching which resulted in strangled vowels (sorry, Kate). She was criticised for taking her time. Not taking on too much in terms of either royal engagements or patronages. Was she, some whispered, just a teensy bit boring?I remember in 2014 watching her stumble over her words at the National Portrait Gallery, as she gave a rare speech. Later that year in Sydney, she made a touching and emotional speech at a children’s hospice, yet continually looked to her husband for reassurance.When, I wondered, would she find her metaphorical feet? For many women, motherhood can be a challenging time. Exciting, nerve-racking, alienating, isolating in the extreme. But for Kate it seemed to be the making of her. I realise that may sound slightly sexist, but it’s not.Being a successful mother, and providing three heirs to the British throne, galvanised her public confidence and has left her much more assured in what she wants to do and where she wants to go. Yes, in her eyes, her most important job is parent to George, Charlotte and Louis. But that success has given her much-needed confidence in her public role. Her interest in children’s early years began long before she was a mum. She was the brains behind the Royal Foundation’s mental health initiative Heads Together and now she wants to see a generational shift in how the nation brings up its children. Seeing her today, comfortable and confident in her role as a senior royal, I have no doubt that the Duchess is finally stepping into the spotlight.
‘She really listened’
Kyla Lethbridge, 15, from Hertfordshire met the Duchess in 2015 when Kate visited children’s mental health unit Acorn Lodge where Kyla was an inpatient.
At the time I was nine years old and had been at Acorn Lodge for about a month. I have ADHD and was suffering from various mental-health issues, including depression. A week before we met Kate, we did an exercise where we wrote letters to her. At the time she was pregnant with Princess Charlotte, so I remember writing that I wished her well with the baby.
A week later, our headteacher came into the unit and told us that we would be meeting Kate that day. We didn’t believe him at first – then about an hour later she walked in. Most people were silent, but I was the first to say something. I think I said, ‘I’m speechless!’ She talked to us for quite a while – or rather she listened to us. There were about ten of us in the class, with a mix of mental-health problems. She seemed to understand what we were going through.
At the time I was prone to violent outbursts, but there was something about her presence that was calming. IknewIhadtobeonmybest behaviour: she is royalty, after all. But that day, she didn’t seem like it – she was so down-to-earth.
After we’d chatted, she had a photo taken with everyone – I’ve still got mine (above). I was grateful that she’d taken time out of her busy life to spend it with us. It made me feel like there was hope. Knowing that there are good people who are willing to talk made me look on the bright side at a time when things were tough. I’ll always remember that.
‘She saw my daughter and said, “I love babies! I wish I could hold her”’
Morgan Cassius, 29, from London, met the Duchess last September at an event in Battersea Park that was part of Kate’s advocacy for early years support. Morgan was invited by Mush, an app for mothers, that she had started using shortly after her daughter was born in March last year.
I’d put my daughter Makena-Grace in the cutest outfit but, 20 minutes before the Duchess arrived, she’d made a mess of it and I’d had to change her. So at that point I wasn’t really worried about anything else going wrong!
When Kate walked towards us her reaction to Makena-Grace was so natural and instinctive. She saw her and smiled, then said to me, ‘I love babies! I wish I could hold her but obviously [because of Covid] I can’t.’
She took her sunglasses off and showed them to Makena-Grace while we were talking and, throughout our conversation, it felt as if she was genuinely interested in my experiences, and wanted to know the answers.
We talked about how I’d expected my maternity leave to be and what it had actually been like because of the pandemic. And also about how the one upside of it had been the extra time that my husband had been able to spend with me and our daughter. ‘Oh yes,’ she said. ‘We mustn’t forget the dads. They need time and support, too.’
She’s really passionate about provision for new mothers and children. I never felt like I was talking to someone who had just put their name to something.
‘The first thing I noticed was her warm smile’
Jacqui Thompson, 54, from Nottingham, met the Duchess in November 2011 when she gave a speech at a fundraising dinner held by the Cambridges in aid of the National Memorial Arboretum. Her husband Gary – a senior aircraftman with the Royal Auxiliary Air Force, who was killed in Afghanistan in 2008 – is one of thousands of service people remembered there.
I could never have imagined I’d be giving a speech in front of the Duchess of Cambridge, but after I lost my husband I got a lot of help from the RAF Benevolent Fund, so I started fundraising for them, and, through them, for the National Memorial Arboretum.
It didn’t really hit me until I got there and I saw the Duke and Duchess walking towards us. She looked stunning in a silver one-shouldered dress – the gown was wonderful.
I was introduced to her and one of the first things I noticed was her warm smile. When she says, ‘It’s nice to meet you’, you really feel like it’s genuine. We talked about Gary and about the Arboretum. When she asked me how I felt about making a speech, I told her I was terrified. She touched me on the arm and said, ‘You’ll be wonderful.’
At dinner I was sitting opposite her but it was one of those large tables that you couldn’t speak across. I tried not to stare but every time I sneaked a look she always had a smile on her face.
I have a daughter the same age as her and having met her I feel very protective towards her. I see her at these events, meeting people and I just know what a difference she makes. I’m in awe of her.
It felt as though we shared a moment’
Rebecca Binstock, 49, from Hertfordshire, met Kate in October 2011, when she accompanied her father Lionel to a charity dinner at Clarence House. The event was meant to be hosted by Prince Charles, but at the last minute Kate stepped in as her father-in-law had to go to a funeral. It was her first solo engagement after marrying Prince William in April that year.
It wasn’t until we got to Clarence House and the doorman told us he had ‘a bit of news’ that we found out we’d be meeting Kate. It was a very intimate event – only around 30 people – so she made her way around the room, speaking to everyone before dinner.
She didn’t seem nervous, but not nearly as self-assured and relaxed as she now seems when you see her at public events. She kept blushing slightly, in the same way that Princess Diana used to, and I remember that striking me at the time. In person she’s so beautiful – she has an almost ethereal quality.
When she got to us, I complimented her on how stunning her wedding dress was. In July that year it had been put on display at Buckingham Palace, and she admitted she had been overwhelmed by the response to the gown. ‘I thought it would only be there for a day or so, but everyone wants to see it,’ she said.
My father can be a little eccentric. I can’t remember what he said to her, but she kept catching my eye when he was talking. It felt as if we had one of those shared moments that you get at a party when someone is trying to extricate themselves… fortunately one of her aides intervened and moved her along!
Interviews: Claire Coleman
Reblog
I tolerated 44 (Obama) for 8 years and kept quiet.
Here is my issue with the whole, “let us all be a United States again” that we heard from Joe Biden.
For the last 4+ years, the Democrats have gone scorched earth. You have salted the fields and now you want to grow crops.
The problem is 72+ million of us have memories longer than a hamster.
We remember the women’s march (vagina hats and all) the day after inauguration.
We remember the 4 years of attacks and impeachments
We remember “not our president” and the “Resistance…”
We remember Maxie Walters telling followers to harass us in restaurants.
We remember the Presidents spokesperson being kicked out a restaurant.
We remember hundreds of Trump supporters physically attacked.
We remember Trump supporters getting Doxed, and fired from jobs.
We remember riots, and looting
We remember “a comedian” holding up the President’s severed head
We remember a play in Central park paid with public funding, showing the killing of President Trump
We remember Robert de Niro yelling “F" Trump” at the Tony’s and getting a standing ovation.
We remember Nancy Pelosi tearing up the State of the Union Address.
We remember the total in the tank move on the mainstream media
We remember the non-stop and live fact checking on our President and his supporters.
We remember non-stop in your face lies and open cover-ups from the media.
We remember the President and his staff being spied on.
We remember five Senators shot on a ballfield.
We remember every so-called comedy show turn into nothing but Trump hate fest.
We remember 95% negative coverage in the news.
We remember the state governors asking and getting everything they ask for and then blaming Trump for their problems.
We remember a Trump top aid verbally assaulted in two DC restaurants.
We remember people banging on the Supreme Court doors.
We remember that we were called every name in the book for supporting President Trump.
We remember that Hollywood said they would leave after Trump was elected but they stayed.
This list is endless, but you get the idea.
A party that has been on the attack for 4 long years does not get a free pass with me! Why should these people be who run the country?
Copy and paste because FB wouldn't let me share.