Megxit - Tumblr Posts
“The actual trigger for the hardest of Megxits, though, after the couple had decamped to Vancouver Island, was when the Queen removed a picture of the Sussexes from her desk for her 2019 Christmas broadcast. “That one,” she said to the director preparing to film her. “I don’t suppose we need that one.” It was a flourish worthy of Stalin.”
I am a huge fan of Ben Shapiro and The Dailey Wire, but when I saw this headline I was just floored. This is normally a pretty serious publication, so who on earth did Sunshine Sachs payoff this time??? Regardless, the comments are great! Seriously, people in the USA are just as revolted as the UK. Please if you find this reblog! Thanks! 😊
PH bio is very telling....MM is mentioned as his wife but not by name. Only as the Duchess of Sussex. It also has no mention of Archie! MM's does! She obviously never played chess because if she had she would have known the Queen always wins!!!!
HMTQ has spoken
DM todayhttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8587307/Meghan-Markles-proud-feminist-biography-statement-deleted.html I know this must have been posted before. But it seems the RF courtiers have stripped Megan of her title. At least on a virtual level. HMTQ has spoken. Indirectly this time. ________________ Meghan Markle’s biography on the Royal website STRIPS her of her HRH title and is edited to downplay her work after her Megxit departure to Los Angeles Royal Family’s official website now refers to Meghan, 38, as ‘she’ or ‘Duchess’ Details of education, career and royal engagements moved to separate section Mention of her philanthropic activities have been moved to 'Charitable Work’ Meghan’s 'about’ section now references her move to America
Of note….in Harry’s as you scroll down…he is referred to as his royal highness……so there you go! Thank you!😊❤️❤️❤️❤️
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=468531704348060
Not all American journalists are falling for her pity party.
God bless this man. A true gentleman and a pince among men.
SIR KENNETH OLISA: Why I, the Queen’s first black Lord Lieutenant, do not believe the royals are racist (and yes, my wife and I discussed the colour of our mixed-race child with our family)
By SIR KENNETH OLISA FOR THE DAILY MAIL
PUBLISHED: 22:45, 10 March 2021 | UPDATED: 22:45, 10 March 2021
One of the most contentious claims made in Meghan Markle’s interview with Oprah Winfrey this week was that one about race.
A member of the Royal Family is alleged to have raised questions or concerns about ‘how dark’ the skin of Meghan’s child might be.
And the uproar that ensued has been deafening, with the word ‘racist’ recurring in almost every news report.
But I would ask for a moment’s pause and reflection. Before we leap to the conclusion that this was a vulgar, racist question, we should recognise that we know neither the context nor the intent behind the supposed inquiry.
I’m drawing on first-hand experience here. My wife Julia and I were asked exactly the same question — in a spirit of benign interest — by my mother-in-law Muriel shortly before the first of our two daughters was born in 1980.
I should point out here that, like Meghan and Harry, I am black and Julia is white.
The Duke of Sussex and The Lord-Lieutenant of Greater London, Sir Kenneth Olisa, arrive at the Audi Sentebale Concert at Hampton Court Palace on June 11, 2019
My late mother-in-law, excited about the arrival of her first grandchild, was getting her knitting needles out and simply wanted to know what colour baby clothes would suit the newborn’s complexion.
She asked in much the same way that any of us might wonder: will the baby have her mother’s hair or her father’s nose? Absolutely no offence was intended or taken.
The context of that conversation was a loving family, its intent to resolve the question of buying wool — which goes to show that unless you know both context and intent of what people say, you must keep an open mind.
In light of this interview, I feel desperately sad that, after our collective response to Covid shone such a warm light on the British values of community, the nation is now in grave danger of being divided by the question of racism.
In 2015, Her Majesty The Queen appointed me as Her Lord-Lieutenant of Greater London — the first British-born non-white holder of this ancient post.
In that capacity I support the Queen and the Royal Family, helping them to build bridges, to connect people and organisations and enhance Londoners’ sense of belonging to an inclusive capital.
As a result, I have had the privilege of meeting all of the members of the Royal Family on many occasions — and I can confirm that they are charming and inclusive.
That is not just my perception — it is one shared by the many thousands of people whom I have seen react to the special ‘pixie dust’ which a royal visitor sprinkles over those they meet.
Another well written article by a true gentleman. I applaud you sir!
'I have worked for the royal family for 10 years — they’re not racists' by Musharraf Hussain
‘I have worked for the royal family for 10 years — they’re not racists’ by Musharraf Hussain
View On WordPress
What is up with this journalist? Does anyone know who she is because she seems to me to really laying the "Look at me, I'm the victim here, now let's give DoC a rough time, it's all the presses fault" narrative a bit thick. New "source" for the 6's? Any clarification would be fantastic. Thank you!
Will be adding this to my books I must read list! Many blessings upon you Jean!
A wonderful article! Spot on!
Markled again...bwa ha ha ha!!!
I feel like I am in HS ... He's 40 years old .
Some people have real problems.
Bravo 👏👏👏👏👏
Woke is the roar of smug, entitled mediocrities everywhere: The insanity of a world where Thomas The Tank Engine, craft beers and even country walks are branded racist drives
By JULIE BURCHILL FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY
PUBLISHED: 22:01 BST, 23 October 2021 | UPDATED: 09:37 BST, 24 October 2021
Prince Harry’s father, Prince Charles (perhaps the grandaddy of Woke, with his mutterings on this and that), has long exemplified my observation: ‘It’s no wonder that the wealthy are friends of the Earth – it’s been a damn good friend to them’
None of these ‘Green’ hypocrites could hold a hand-poured soy wax vegan Highgrove candle to their kingpin, the Prince of Wales, who in 2007 flew first class to America – with an entourage of 20 people – to collect an environmental award. And then, two years later, used a private jet on an ‘environmental’ tour of South America, costing approximately £300,000 for a 16,000-mile trip. Say what you like about Prince Harry’s parentage, in this department he certainly seems to be a chip off the old blockhead.
Prince Charles has an actress chum, too. Emma Thompson (the grandmother of Woke) flew in first class from Los Angeles to London to join the Extinction Rebellion protests of spring 2019 – a 5,456-mile transatlantic flight that stomped out a three-ton carbon footprint. Extinction Rebellion, which demands that flights be used only in emergencies, simpered that Dame Emma’s jaunt was ‘an unfortunate cost in our bigger battle to save the planet’.
In short, Green – like Wokeness itself – is the first socio-political movement in which every mover and shaker ranges from well-off to filthy rich.
Between 2017 and 2019 I had a rather embarrassing crush on Meghan Markle
Meghan has never waited soppily for some prince to rescue her,’ I wrote in one magazine. ‘In fact, it seems far likelier that it is she who will rescue the prince.’ CRINGE! as the youngsters say. Thankfully, I was swiftly thoroughly disillusioned.
‘Harry and Meghan took four private jets in 11 days after a summer of lecturing us about climate change; this followed shortly after the Prince’s jaunt to the Google climate change summit where he is also thought to have taken a helicopter, as he habitually uses them to fly short distances whereas the Queen makes do with a train,’ I scribbled in another article. Having Elton John rush in to defend them didn’t help, but only further established that the Sussexes saw themselves as international stars rather than one nation’s public servants.’
Shortly after hearing that Meghan planned to semi-retire from Royal duties in order to spend more time with her merchandising, I coined the phrase the ‘Grabdication’ (grabbing the limelight, grabbing the status, grabbing the cash) and my rehabilitation was complete.
The Grabdication was another Woke event, along with the Gender Recognition Act and the Remoaner refusal to accept Brexit, which while appearing to be liberal was actually the opposite.
The Grabdication told peasants that princes may do as they wish with no regard to public opinion
We’d been on this ‘do-as-I-say- not-as-I-fly’ bumpy ride before, of course; Prince Harry’s father, Prince Charles (perhaps the grandaddy of Woke, with his mutterings on this and that), has long exemplified my observation: ‘It’s no wonder that the wealthy are friends of the Earth – it’s been a damn good friend to them.’ The idea of a pre-industrial Eden – the rich man in his castle, the poor man at his gate – has fuelled the righteous fury of aristocrats against capitalism since the late 1960s.
Meghan couldn’t keep away from the US, and it soon became clear exactly why she had left her husband’s home country, dragging the poor sap behind her. She didn’t want to be out of the limelight – she just wanted a different kind of limelight.
The American-born, London-based Royal commentator Ashley Pearson provided a piquant comment which certainly rang true, considering the peevishness which emanated from the couple as soon as the honeymoon was over: ‘She had no idea how unglamorous it really is to be a Royal and, when she found out she would be a civil servant in a tiara, she was, like, “No way.’’ ’ Which brings us right back to the Grabdication, when a heady blend of wealth, celebrity and Wokeness reached its shining peak, and it was briefly Camelot for Meghan and Harry, the fraudulent monarchs of a fraudulent movement: the First Couple of Woke.
From the September 2019 issue of Vogue, edited by none other than Me-Again herself, to the moment they were revealed as the only people apart from Greta Garbo ever to move to Hollywood because they wanted to be left alone, they could do no wrong.
And then the Grabdication went bust, and was revealed as being as morally bankrupt as the celebrity and the Wokeness which had spawned it, with a whole nasty level of its own because the three belief systems had never been seen in the same place before.
The Sussexes’ more-in-sorrow-than-in-anger faces stopped selling magazines as we shied away from yet another showboating photo-op of them handing out food to the poor. Their popularity plummeted, with a YouGov poll showing that they were only marginally more popular than Princess Anne’s corgi-killing dog Dotty.
Never mind – they’ll have their multi-million-dollar Netflix deal to keep them warm until the Americans realise there’s nothing special about them without the musty tinge of monarchy – which will surely evaporate quickly when that blinding Pacific sunshine is let in upon the magic.
Comment: A very long article which also encompasses politics and racism so I have just blogged the RF part. Access to complete article via header link
With all the Sussex supporters alluding to this in the past, this will be like an early Christmas present.
Doctored image of 'abused' Kate Middleton in domestic violence campaign was used without Palace permission
