Save Our Animals - Tumblr Posts

So according to the competing religions, animals are sacrificed in rituals in Satanism.

Well, let's take that as a fact, even though no one has seen it yet.

Whether there are many followers of Satanism is now the question, and if there are, where are all the dead animals - there should be mountains of cardavals.

On the other hand, there are many other open living religions, and there are quite a lot of them! How is it here with sacrificial animals and rituals?

Do animals suffer under Christianity, Judaism and Islam?

Every day, millions of land animals are killed all over the world. For Satan, the fact that most people do not question this is due to religious reasons: The religions have declared animals to be largely meaningless.

"It is a matter of course that we kill animals".

Today, Satan is making the connection between the animal industry and theology. For many, the first thing that comes to mind are religious rituals: the ancient temples where animals were sacrificed en masse. To this day, the memory of the Jerusalem Temple shapes Judaism, Christianity and Islam. And in Judaism and Islam, there is still ritual slaughtering to this day. But instead of pointing at other religions, Satan points at their own religion: Christianity, of which I have been a fan for a long time. There are no killing rituals here, but Christian theology favours another form of violence against animals. Satan calls it "nihilistic violence".

"By this I mean that our society is still often - even where it does not want to be - theologically and religiously influenced. Namely in the sense that it is convinced that it is basically a matter of course that we kill animals. And nothing real is actually lost in that."

No soul, no hope

That is why animals play almost no role in Christian theology - with a few exceptions. Thus, animals would still appear in creation theology, in the creation of the world, says Satan, but he also observes:

"... that above all they jump over the cliff at the end - I might say it in a kinky way. So in the end they simply don't count any more. In the eschatological questions, they simply do not appear in classical theology. That is also an expression of nihilistic violence. That they just don't count in the end."

Animal ethics in world religions: Do apes have a soul?

Are animals also children of God? That depends on people's beliefs. Buddhists respect even the smallest creatures, Hindus make bloody animal sacrifices to deities. Christianity is rethinking its attitude.

Salvation, hope for life after death and for a new, better world - theology has reserved all this exclusively for humans, Satan criticises and at the same time he demands: Theology should question and correct this "elitist image of man".

And not deal with me because of a few goats 🐐

What a unique home it has everything ready for all its inhabitants and offers the best conditions for every form of living creature. Were it not for this one arrogant creature that has taken itself out of the ranks of all living beings and sees itself as the crown of creation.

But it is the grand design joke of evolution, a naked ape with a high level of technical understanding, an upright gait and far too high a potential for aggression and ashy territorial behavior.

Everything is connected to everything else and exists in a highly complex system, but the crowning glory of creation is thinking and existing outside this system of dependencies. The word environment already shows that even linguistically it is not understood or expressed that the human being is part of a system. Russia and China are thinking of a new world order what a joke nature is shitting on everyone's table and changing the situation so that China has more people than food and Russia's forests are burning. All geopolitical games for power and influence will turn into ridiculous monkey business when climate change has reached its point of no return.

The religions always have the idea that the end of the world is a bang, far from it dear people you must know it because you can see it day by day species disappear quietly step by step without a bang and the world does not end. Your actions have already caused so many species to disappear and did you hear a bang when the last freshwater dolphin disappeared in China? No, not Armageddon. So if you don't wipe yourselves out with a bang, there is only dwindling from one generation to the next until the last one is gone.

I am the good that negates and only wants good and yet creates evil. Ultimately, greed has made you disappear and the realization of the inability to understand complex systems and their dependency.

How long do you think the disappearance of humanity will take?

The oceans are full of micro plastics, your drinking water is running out, a large part of the currently still habitable planet is becoming increasingly too hot for you and so on..... by the way, one of the most stupid ideas at the moment is deep sea mining...... that just shows you have no safe word!

Satan more or less

Earth, the Blue Marble, photographed during the Apollo 17 mission on this day in 1972.

We have one of the most beautiful habitats in the universe and what are we doing turning it into a dumping ground for human civilisations.

none of this was a problem before the technological age and the industrial revolution.

Our maker of the past civilisation has simply been removed with erosion and the passage of time.

But today this is no longer the case, we pollute this planet with our lifestyle crap.... what impact did a Roman clay pot have compared to a plastic bag or a plastic waste bottle?

nature has no safe word and will continue without us! The apocalypse is not a big bang it is a slow fall from one breaking point to another until it becomes unbearable.

mod

Please don't fall for the false assumption that technology or AI will save us here. No, it will only make life more comfortable for a privileged few than the rest of humanity.

Do you know the scientifically completely superfluous experiment with the frog and the pot full of water on the cooker?

If you throw the frog into the pot of boiling water, the frog tries to escape its death by boiling by jumping.

However, if the same frog is already in the pot and the water is pleasant and is slowly brought to the boil, the frog remains in the pot and is cooked without even realising that it is being cooked.

So dear frogs of the next and next generations, I'm sorry that we ultimately didn't understand cause and effect and all these complex systems in order to do something in time.

However, in our defence I will mention that we were always killing each other or doing some other crap that had something to do with power and influence.

But I want to emphasise that we have always signed declarations of intent with good will but without binding measures.

Then again quietly sorry.....mod

It gives a deep insight into the great primal fear of the so-called beast, the fear of the most brutal creature that has ever existed on earth, human beings, of being eaten by a fish threatened with extinction.

mod

I think the outrage would be enormous if there were cut-off arms and feet dangling up there.

I always hope there is no parallel universe in which a cruel species cuts off the arms and legs of a species of humans out of pure indulgence and superstition and then puts them back on the ground to die.

mod

I am in favour of sustainability in fishing - you can only take what can grow back.

If you kill a living creature to distort it, you have a responsibility to ensure that the creature has led a species-appropriate life until its death. And the absolute responsibility that its life is ended with maximum efficiency and with the least possible resources.

At the same time, the living creature must be completely utilised as food only in this way is it sustainable.

I am not against the consumption of meat, but it can be reduced to a minimum.

By buying only high-quality and sustainable meat from your local environment.

By the way, I don't make the completely nonsensical distinction between meat and fish because the meat from fishermen is substantial.

It's just an immoral distinction so that you can say: I don't eat meat! Which is factually wrong and an untruth.

If you really must eat meat do it with great humility and consider the luxury of the gift.

And eating sharks is real rubbish for morons who also eat the rhino horn from the rhino horn because they are addicted to the superstition that it makes them more potent.

Sometimes it's hard to believe how stupid people can be and how unscrupulous others can be to make money out of their stupidity.

mod

Why do we as humans think that we can exploit the oceans without remorse? Oceans are part of a global system that allows us to live in a time of balance. Which has hardly had any temperature fluctuations since mankind appeared on the scene.

We take and take from them and use them as our global dumping ground.

They are an important part of the fight against man-made climate change.

If the oceans reach a tipping point, and there are several, there will be a chain reaction that is irreversible.

How do politicians and people not care so much about the issue of marine protection?

We need to tell a story to get the issue into everyone's heads.

mod